If any of this feels familiar
- Decisions reopen after being made
- Execution depends on heroics
- Alignment fades between meetings
- Tension stays polite but unresolved
- A few people become bottlenecks
- Energy spikes, then collapses
- Priorities shift faster than delivery
- Accountability is present but ownership is unclear
These are not motivation problems. They are system problems. They emerge when speed, complexity, and interdependence cross a threshold.
What changes when this works
| Before | After | |
|---|---|---|
| Decision fog | → | Decision hygiene |
| Bottlenecks | → | Distributed authority |
| Polite tension | → | Fast, direct conflict |
| Burn cycles | → | Sustainable pace |
| Alignment drift | → | Execution coherence |
| Heroics | → | Reliable delivery |
- Faster decisions with fewer reopens.
- More reliable execution without burnout.
What we change in the system
- Decision mechanics: what type of decision, who decides, what gets reopened.
- Role clarity: ownership, handoffs, and authority distribution.
- Candor and tension: getting the real issues into the room early.
- Power and influence: making informal influence discussable and usable.
- Energy and pace: rhythm that sustains performance.
How engagements typically run
Formats
- One-off diagnostic session
- 4–6 week intervention
- Ongoing leadership team coaching
What happens first
- Diagnostic
- Live conversation
- System map
- Clear intervention hypothesis
What this is not
- Not facilitation
- Not therapy
- Not culture work without operational impact
Why systems coaching works for venture teams
The system is the client
We coach how your leadership team makes decisions under pressure.
Every voice belongs
Unspoken dissent is operational risk.
Patterns over episodes
Recurring friction is data, not noise.
High-growth teams fail not at talent, but at coordination thresholds. Systems coaching targets the mechanics of coordination.
Why this work, and why with me
I work with venture leadership teams that are past the "talent problem" stage and now face coordination limits. My background sits at the intersection of systems coaching and growth-stage operating work. I'm direct, practical, and focused on changing what happens in real meetings.
- Systems coaching: ORSC-trained, working with the relationship as the client rather than individual blame.
- Growth-stage operating sense: decisions, roles, cadence, and execution under pressure.
- Practical stance: small experiments inside real leadership meetings.
This is not advisory, facilitation, or therapy. It is targeted intervention in how leadership systems function.
More on ORSC
- The system is the client — we work on the "us," not on who's "right."
- Every voice belongs — even dissent is data the system needs.
- Patterns over episodes — repeated dynamics are coachable and can be redesigned.
- Roles, edges, and polarities — healthy systems allow roles to shift, edges to be crossed, and tensions to be harnessed.